Demand forecasting
Project demand by product, location or customer group. Give planners an earlier view of likely stock pressure and excess cover.
Operational losses often leave clues in the weeks before they reach the accounts. Griffith's Digital Insights Ltd. builds AI forecasting solutions on your own historical data, tests them against past outcomes, then puts useful signals into the tools your team already uses.
Plan demand, spot likely equipment failure, flag churn, forecast cash flow and investigate unusual activity sooner. Each model is checked before it informs a live decision.
Illustrative interface only. Example labels and values are not client results.
Start with a costly decision that arrives too late. Build the model around the action someone can take when an early signal appears.
Project demand by product, location or customer group. Give planners an earlier view of likely stock pressure and excess cover.
Score failure likelihood using asset history and operating signals, so maintenance teams can assess risk before an unplanned stoppage.
Identify accounts showing early signs of disengagement. Give customer teams time to review the relationship and choose a response.
Project receipts and payments using ledger history and sales pipeline data. Compare trading scenarios to see where timing could tighten.
Flag unusual transactions, claims patterns or supplier behaviour for review. Link each signal to its source so investigation can start with evidence.
The first task is checking whether the available records can answer the business question. Then we test model options against historical periods and review the misses with your team.
Evidence comes first.
Review history depth, missing values, record frequency and whether the target outcome is captured consistently. If the evidence is too thin, we say so before modelling begins.
Check which operational factors appear before the event being predicted. Keep features tied to a real process and make their meaning clear to the people who will use the result.
Test suitable methods and weigh accuracy against explainability and the effort needed to maintain the model. Choose the approach that fits the decision, not the one with the most impressive label.
Run predictions against past periods the model has not seen. Review false positives and missed events with the business before any output is allowed to influence a live decision.
A prediction has to reach the person who can act on it. Griffith's Digital Insights Ltd. puts model outputs where planning and review already happen.
Show the estimate, confidence range and key drivers alongside current performance measures.
Route a threshold breach to the right role, with context that helps them decide what to check next.
Feed scores and projections into scheduled reports or planning systems your team already knows.
Show the main factors behind a prediction so staff can challenge an output when operational context changes.
Example measures to agree for each model. Values are illustrative.
Monitoring tracks error, drift and outcomes against thresholds agreed for the use case. Scheduled refreshes, seasonal recalibration or retraining can follow when the evidence calls for it.
A useful alert separates routine variation from a change worth investigating. Thresholds are tuned against your data and the cost of interrupting someone unnecessarily.
Route a high-severity exception to the responsible role with a direct link to the related transaction or asset record.
Add the exception to a dashboard queue or scheduled digest for a closer check during the working day.
Record lower-priority changes for a routine review without sending an immediate interruption.
Define who receives an exception, where it appears and what evidence accompanies it. Review alert effectiveness over time so thresholds reflect the work, not just the model.
Performance is reported in terms the business can use: what the model predicted, what happened and how early a team could respond. Measures depend on the data and decision.
Track failure signals, confirmed faults and stoppages avoided after planned intervention.
Compare projected and actual demand by product, region or planning period.
Measure lead time between a risk flag, a review and a recorded payment outcome.
Report unusual claims or transactions flagged, investigated and confirmed by the team.
Predictive analytics needs consistent history and a recorded outcome to learn from. If definitions change between systems or teams, a dashboard and cleaner reporting may be the right first step. We’ll scope the data and decision before recommending a model.
Tell us which decision is still based on instinct or arrives after the reporting cut-off. We’ll discuss the available history, the outcome you need to predict and what a realistic first model could show.
The first conversation defines the scope before any modelling programme is agreed. Start with one decision.
Discuss a forecasting project